Skip to main content

John Hunter - Another obsessive collector

Recently whilst drinking in a pub near Holborn station, I realised I was near a museum I'd wanted to visit since I first moved to London. So with some great persuasive efforts I managed to entice my friends away from the warmth and comfort of an open fire and pint of ale to walk to the royal college of surgeons. In the basement of which is the Huntarian musuem, a collection of anatomical specimens either partially dissected to showcase the intricacies of the body, or exhibited to highlight interesting examples of errant homeostatic processes.




Entering John Hunters massive collection, one is instantly staged by the array of formaldehyde filled jars, and instantly the curiousty and "where to start first" sensation takes over.

I thought you could take pictures, but after one I was instantly chastised, here it is though (not the best example of the diverse array of anatomical specimens - so there's a website pic below as well)



A brief aside to overview who John Hunter was: born in 1728, his brother William was a surgeon, and John soon became fascinated in anatomy himself. After training in Scotland he was enlisted as a war surgeon, working and intricately documenting war wounds. Much later he became a member of the royal college of surgeons, and following his demise, the college purchased his large collection of anatomical dissections for exhibition.

As well as documenting war wounds, Hunter also had a fascination with a swathe of then undiscovered/under analysed bodily functions. Amongst Hunters passions within anatomy lay a curiosity with the digestive and lymphatic system. Enter a vast array of different animals with outer tissue removed to expose the underlying labyrinth of intestines and sections cut out identifying the duodenum and other notable characteristics of the digestive tract. Turn a corner and you'll be greeted (without warning), of Hunter's collection of foeti, as he was the first to definitively map the development of children within the womb. Interesting in other exhibitions showing what some may feel "inflammatory" exhibits of foetal anatomical dissections (i.e. Gunther van Hagens Body Worlds) there are a host of warnings and signs. I felt much better that there were none of these things, as this isn't some crude freak show, but documentation of the then forefront of scientific understanding.

Speaking of freak shows, there are exhibits of what Hunter obviously felt were (undoubtedly) curious human subjects. Taking the pedestal is the 7ft 7" skeleton of Irish giant Charles Byrne. Also included is the skull of an individual with severe, untreated hydroencephalitis, resulting in a massive and deformed cranium, alongside which is a manipulated skull from the peruvian Nazca culture, which made the main non-fictional element to the 4th Indiana Jones film - similar to this one pictured (if it were transparent and stuffed with cling film - crystal effect yeah)


All in all, this museum was more exciting and interesting than I expected, and apart from making my friends wait while I finished watching a 'how-to' video documenting brain tumour removal, they came away feeling much the same.

Highly recommended - 4.5 dissected limbs out of 5....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"How do NK cells know not to kill RBCs?"

I was recently asked about the surveillance system present within immunity which operates to kill virally infected cells by lack of MHC expression, and why this same system doesn't destroy red blood cells (RBC), which lack MHC. One function of Natural Killer (NK) cells is to destroy cells infected by viruses, which have a mechanism of evading T-cell killing by down-regulating MHC class I expression. MHC class I molecules are expressed on every cell in the body apart from RBCs; a lack of expression is detected by NK cells which act to destroy the cell. However, RBC remain unharmed. SEM of NK cells Red Blood Cells                         V.S Like everyone else I assumed the almighty google would provide me with the answer to my friends question, so I typed in my query and the only relevant link was to a 'yahoo answers' page, which answered a succinctly phrased question whi...

Rudolf Virchow

Following on from my visit to the Huntarian museum in London, which documented anatomical specimens in innumerable jars, I visited the German equivalent in Berlin - The Medizinhistorisches Museum on Charite University campus. As expected from the guide books and hype from my Deutsch colleagues, the exhibit is truly fascinating with some morbid sections which warrant the over 16s certification. It is these specimens that are naturally off-putting to some (as evolution dictates innate disgust at abnormality) which are incredibly fascinating documents of life trying to survive regardless of aberrant genetics. Naturally one feels a sadness when viewing some specimens, especially due to the young age of the subject, but regardless, scientific intrigue overrides in this astounding museum. In a section of the museum devoted to eminent German scientists I read about Rudolf Virchow, and whilst reading the short summary next to a compilation of his belongings in a cabinet, ...

Wellcome Collection - BRAINS exhibition

In a moment of rare foresight I decided to spend my 1 hour waiting for a connecting train at Euston station, visiting the latest exhibition on brains at the Wellcome collection . Previously I'd visited the exhibition on skin (unsurprisingly named SKIN ), which served up the right amount of visual and mental stimulation. This latest exhibition proved to be as interesting, but didn't live up to my own hype after the last visit. Security staff greeted me with the deferential smile of 'I'm just doing my job mate', as they politely searched my bag. After being established as benign, I entered through glass doors to be welcomed by an aptly simple title for the show: BRAINS. The familiar blurb preceeding the exhibition provided a prĂ©cis and rationale for the show. The latter, as you can imagine, was due to a lack of understanding by the public and the obvious importance of the brain. I particularly enjoyed the boldness of the neuroscientists sentiment - to prove that per...